PS7000 Acoustic Impedance vs PS7010 Acoustic Attenuation: Ultrasonic Density Meter Comparison
Two ultrasonic density meters, two different physics: acoustic impedance reflection versus acoustic attenuation transmission, and which process conditions decide between them.
Reading time: 5 min
Customers reasonably ask why there are two ultrasonic density meters in the range. The answer is that they measure different things. PS7000 reads a reflection at one boundary; PS7010 reads how much energy survives a path across the pipe. Same family of waves, different measurement, different failure modes.
The short version
If you can tap the pipe, choose PS7000 — it handles larger bore, tolerates entrained gas, and is less sensitive to changes in grind. If you cannot tap the pipe, choose PS7010 and confirm the bubble content first, because that is the condition most likely to rule it out.
Where the choice usually lands
Condition
PS7000
PS7010
Pipe cannot be tapped
No
Yes
Bore above DN500
Yes
No
Entrained gas present
Yes
Poor
Grind varies with ore blend
Better
Sensitive
Trial or relocatable install
No
Yes
Lined or non-metallic pipe
Depends
Ask before ordering
Steps
Measurement principle
PS7000 uses acoustic impedance: a single sensor transmits and receives, with linear frequency-modulated (chirp) excitation, and the density follows from the reflection at the sensor-to-slurry boundary together with the measured sound speed. PS7010 uses acoustic attenuation: two sensors face each other across the pipe, one transmitting and one receiving, and concentration follows from how much energy the medium absorbs and scatters along that path. The consequence that matters commercially is that impedance is a single-face measurement while attenuation is a through-path measurement — almost every difference below traces back to that one distinction. Background: acoustic impedance and the attenuation coefficient.
Installation
PS7000 mounts either as a spool piece with flanges spliced into the line, or by welding a base onto an existing pipe through a bored hole — so it needs a tapping and therefore a shutdown window. In both arrangements the sensor face finishes flush with the bore, so nothing protrudes into the stream. PS7010 clamps onto the outside of the pipe with steel bands and needs no penetration at all, or can be supplied as a spool piece if preferred. The clamp-on option is often decisive on lines that cannot be shut down, and it carries a second advantage that is easy to undervalue: if the first position proves wrong, the instrument can be moved. Installation position causes more disappointing first weeks than any other factor.
Bubble tolerance
This is the most important practical difference and the one most often discovered late. Gas bubbles scatter strongly and resonate, presenting an acoustic cross-section far larger than their physical size, so a void fraction well under one percent can absorb a transmission path and drive the PS7010's received signal toward zero. PS7000's single-face measurement does not depend on energy surviving a crossing, so it tolerates entrained air and additionally outputs a gas index (0–100) with a bubble flag alongside the density value. Where a process deliberately aerates — flotation, FGD oxidation air, agitated tanks — that diagnostic is not a convenience but the thing that lets an operator separate more solids from more bubbles, since both move a naive density reading the same way.
Pipe wall and material
PS7010 in clamp-on form sends its signal through the pipe wall twice, so wall material, wall thickness and the condition of the outside surface all matter. Heavily scaled, coated, lined or non-metallic pipe can attenuate or scatter enough to make the arrangement unworkable, and this needs confirming before ordering rather than at commissioning. PS7000 places the sensor face at the bore, so the pipe wall is not in the acoustic path at all and its material is irrelevant to the measurement — the trade being that a penetration is required. Where a spool piece is acceptable for either instrument, both avoid the wall question, and the choice returns to bore size and gas content.
Bore size range
PS7000 covers DN50–DN1000, with larger bores available as a custom build. PS7010 covers DN50–DN500. The reason is physics rather than product policy: received energy falls exponentially with path length, so a through-transmission arrangement runs out of signal as the path grows, particularly at high concentration where attenuation is already high. This single line eliminates PS7010 from most FGD absorber recirculation mains, large tailings lines and dredge discharge lines, which routinely run DN500 and above.
Typical applications
PS7000 suits mining slurry and cyclone circuits, FGD limestone and gypsum slurry, coal-washing heavy media, tailings, and dredge discharge — abrasive, large-bore, often aerated duties where a radiometric gauge used to be the default. PS7010 suits retrofits where tapping is impossible, low-bubble solutions and syrups, black liquor, trial installations where the measuring point is not yet settled, and temporary surveys. A practical note that applies to both: prefer a vertical rising section over a horizontal run, and interlock the reading to a pump-running signal, since a stopped line settles and the resulting steady climb in indicated density is a stagnation artefact rather than a process event.
Choose which cookies you allow. Essential cookies are always on — without them the site would not function. Other categories are off by default and only activate when you save them here.
Required for security (CSRF tokens), session continuity, and remembering your language and consent choices. Cannot be disabled.
Helps us understand how visitors use the site (which pages are popular, how people navigate). Powered by Google Analytics 4 (international visitors) and Baidu Tongji (China visitors). Disabling these means we lose the ability to improve based on actual usage.
Reserved for future use. We do not currently run advertising or remarketing pixels.