How to Choose an Industrial Online Density Meter: A 6-Step Method

Choosing an online density meter isn't just reading the accuracy number on a datasheet. This guide walks six connected decision steps across medium, installation, accuracy, and compliance to land on the right principle and model.

Most density-meter selection failures aren't about accuracy — they're about choosing the wrong principle. The most expensive high-accuracy meter in the wrong process won't run stably. This article uses reverse-elimination from 'can't use' to 'should use' across 6 standardized decision steps.

Steps

  1. Step 1: Document medium properties

    Record medium name, density range (min-max), temperature range, pressure range, pH, solids fraction, presence of bubbles, scaling/crystallization tendency, corrosivity. This single table drives every downstream decision — solids / gas / scaling properties alone will eliminate over half the principles.
  2. Step 2: Define accuracy tier

    Custody transfer → ±0.0005 g/cm³ class (Coriolis PS7200); process control → ±0.001 g/cm³ class (fork / DP / ultrasonic); trend monitoring → ±0.005 g/cm³ class (most principles). Repeatability matters more than absolute accuracy for alarms and closed-loop control — list it separately.
  3. Step 3: Audit installation constraints

    Can the pipe be tapped / hot-worked? (No → PS7010 clamp-on) Is straight run adequate? (DP, ultrasonic, Coriolis all need ≥ 3D upstream + 2D downstream) Pipe size? (< DN50 narrows the field; > DN600 favors DP) Tank top / wall / pipe? — drives PS7300 A/B/C mounting choice.
  4. Step 4: Check compliance and Ex requirements

    Radiometric source acceptable? (No → all non-nuclear; Yes → still prefer PS7500 Na22 exempt-activity) Hazardous zone? (Zone 1 mandates Ex) Food / pharma sanitary? (tri-clamp + 316L polished) Export approvals? (CE, ATEX, IECEx)
  5. Step 5: Rank the 'feasible set' by priority

    After Steps 1-4 eliminate non-fits, rank what's left by: (a) field engineer familiarity; (b) spare-parts logistics; (c) Total Cost of Ownership (TCO — 5-year parts + calibration + downtime); (d) integration interface compatibility (4-20mA / HART / Modbus / Profibus).
  6. Step 6: Send to a Pisonics application engineer

    Send your Step 1-5 spec sheet plus proposed model(s) to a Pisonics engineer for a written sizing proposal — we commit to a 2-business-day turnaround with recommended model, material options, accessories list, and price range. This step avoids the 'looks right on paper, fails on site' pattern from picking purely off datasheet specs.

Keep reading

NEED HELP CHOOSING?

Talk to an engineer

Contact us